Kazakhstan vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Kazakhstan
14.71 % change on previous year
in 2023
Turkmenistan
14.29 % change on previous year
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
17th
Turkmenistan rank
18th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Turkmenistan
-1000100200300400199320082023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 14.71 % change on previous year against 14.29 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.42 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Turkmenistan ranks 18th of 121 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s -6.82 % change on previous year 4.86 % change on previous year 11.68 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s 2.62 % change on previous year 5.7 % change on previous year 3.09 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2010s 1.84 % change on previous year 25.32 % change on previous year 23.48 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2020s 0.3674 % change on previous year 0.4464 % change on previous year 0.079 % change on previous year Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Kazakhstan or Turkmenistan?
Kazakhstan, at 14.71 % change on previous year against 14.29 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan?
0.42 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Turkmenistan ranks 18th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/turkmenistan/">Kazakhstan vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.