Oceania vs Panama: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Oceania
-15.38 % change on previous year
in 2023
Panama
2.63 % change on previous year
in 2023
Oceania rank
34th
Panama rank
34th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Oceania
  • Panama
-1000100200300400196219922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 2.63 % change on previous year against -15.38 % change on previous year in Oceania, a difference of 18.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Oceania ahead.

Oceania ranks 34th and Panama ranks 34th of 34 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 6 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 3.47 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year 0.6254 % change on previous year Oceania
1970s 11.47 % change on previous year -2.28 % change on previous year 13.76 % change on previous year Oceania
1980s 1.35 % change on previous year -0.4909 % change on previous year 1.84 % change on previous year Oceania
1990s 4.44 % change on previous year -0.4045 % change on previous year 4.84 % change on previous year Oceania
2000s -4.35 % change on previous year 3.26 % change on previous year 7.61 % change on previous year Panama
2010s 34.14 % change on previous year -0.0065 % change on previous year 34.15 % change on previous year Oceania
2020s 99.11 % change on previous year 1.35 % change on previous year 97.76 % change on previous year Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Oceania or Panama?
Panama, at 2.63 % change on previous year against -15.38 % change on previous year in Oceania as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Oceania and Panama?
18.01 % change on previous year, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Panama?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Oceania and Panama rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Oceania ranks 34th and Panama ranks 34th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania vs Panama: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/oceania/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/oceania/panama/">Oceania vs Panama: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.