South Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

South Africa
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Trinidad and Tobago
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
South Africa rank
111th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
111th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • South Africa
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-100-50050100196219902018

How they compare

South Africa currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

South Africa ranks 111th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year
1970s 0 % change on previous year 6.67 % change on previous year 6.67 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0 % change on previous year -7.14 % change on previous year 7.14 % change on previous year South Africa
1990s -22.22 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 22.22 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
2000s -75 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 75 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, South Africa or Trinidad and Tobago?
South Africa, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2008.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
38 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2008.
How do South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
South Africa ranks 111th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 111th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/south-africa/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/south-africa/trinidad-and-tobago/">South Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.