Uganda vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Uganda
-13.48 % change on previous year
in 2023
Uzbekistan
-11.11 % change on previous year
in 2023
Uganda rank
101st
Uzbekistan rank
98th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Uganda
  • Uzbekistan
-1000100200196219922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports -11.11 % change on previous year against -13.48 % change on previous year in Uganda, a difference of 2.37 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uganda ahead.

Uganda ranks 101st and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Uganda averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uganda Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 4.61 % change on previous year -0.782 % change on previous year 5.39 % change on previous year Uganda
2000s 3.33 % change on previous year -0.6783 % change on previous year 4.01 % change on previous year Uganda
2010s 9.04 % change on previous year 24.25 % change on previous year 15.21 % change on previous year Uzbekistan
2020s 4.07 % change on previous year -9.7 % change on previous year 13.78 % change on previous year Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Uganda or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at -11.11 % change on previous year against -13.48 % change on previous year in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Uganda and Uzbekistan?
2.37 % change on previous year, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and Uzbekistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Uganda and Uzbekistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Uganda ranks 101st and Uzbekistan ranks 98th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uganda vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/uganda/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/uganda/uzbekistan/">Uganda vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
155 places, 8,546 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.