Australia and New Zealand vs Chad: Rice — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0044 kt
in 2050
Chad
0.0047 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
48th
Chad rank
45th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Chad
00.0020.0040.0060.008196120052050

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0047 kt against 0.0044 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0003 kt.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 48th and Chad ranks 45th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Chad in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 kt 0.0011 kt 0.0001 kt Chad
1970s 0.0026 kt 0.0017 kt 0.0009 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.0041 kt 0.0012 kt 0.0029 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.0051 kt 0.0024 kt 0.0027 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.0029 kt 0.0039 kt 0.001 kt Chad
2010s 0.0025 kt 0.0067 kt 0.0042 kt Chad
2020s 0.0016 kt 0.007 kt 0.0054 kt Chad
2030s 0.0036 kt 0.0044 kt 0.0008 kt Chad
2050s 0.0044 kt 0.0047 kt 0.0003 kt Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Chad?
Chad, at 0.0047 kt against 0.0044 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Chad?
0.0003 kt, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chad?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Chad rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 48th and Chad ranks 45th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Chad: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/chad/">Australia and New Zealand vs Chad: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).