Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Brazil
0.1063 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.1921 kt
in 2050
Brazil rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Brazil
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.1921 kt against 0.1063 kt in Brazil, a difference of 0.0858 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.8 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1558 kt 0.0935 kt 0.0623 kt Brazil
1970s 0.2031 kt 0.0982 kt 0.105 kt Brazil
1980s 0.2171 kt 0.102 kt 0.1151 kt Brazil
1990s 0.1507 kt 0.1237 kt 0.027 kt Brazil
2000s 0.1246 kt 0.1417 kt 0.0171 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.0857 kt 0.1732 kt 0.0875 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.0623 kt 0.1954 kt 0.1331 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.1056 kt 0.1733 kt 0.0677 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 0.1063 kt 0.1921 kt 0.0858 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Brazil or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.1921 kt against 0.1063 kt in Brazil as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
0.0858 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Brazil and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Brazil ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/brazil/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Brazil vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).