China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Rice — Burning crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2050
Solomon Islands
0 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
102nd
Solomon Islands rank
102nd

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Solomon Islands
0000.001196120052050

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 102nd and Solomon Islands ranks 102nd of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 kt 0 kt 0.0004 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0001 kt 0 kt 0.0001 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Solomon Islands
1990s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt
2000s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt
2010s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Solomon Islands
2020s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Solomon Islands
2030s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt
2050s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Solomon Islands?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Solomon Islands as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands?
0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Solomon Islands rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 102nd and Solomon Islands ranks 102nd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/solomon-islands/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Solomon Islands: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).