Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.1921 kt
in 2050
Pakistan
0.1032 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Pakistan rank
13th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Pakistan
0.050.10.150.2196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.1921 kt against 0.1032 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0889 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.9 times Pakistan's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 13th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0935 kt 0.0532 kt 0.0403 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 0.0982 kt 0.0654 kt 0.0328 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 0.102 kt 0.0767 kt 0.0253 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 0.1237 kt 0.0853 kt 0.0383 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.1417 kt 0.0973 kt 0.0444 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.1732 kt 0.1045 kt 0.0687 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.1954 kt 0.1298 kt 0.0656 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.1733 kt 0.1035 kt 0.0698 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 0.1921 kt 0.1032 kt 0.0889 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Pakistan?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.1921 kt against 0.1032 kt in Pakistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
0.0889 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 13th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/pakistan/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Pakistan: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).