Mauritania vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues
Rice — Burning crop residues over time
- Mauritania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.002 kt against 0.0013 kt in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0007 kt.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.5 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Mauritania ranks 66th and Uzbekistan ranks 63rd of 134 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0067 kt | 0.006 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0016 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0.0017 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0005 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.0029 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0012 kt | Mauritania |
| 2030s | 0.001 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0012 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2050s | 0.0013 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0007 kt | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Mauritania or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.002 kt against 0.0013 kt in Mauritania as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Mauritania and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0007 kt, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Uzbekistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Mauritania and Uzbekistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
- Mauritania ranks 66th and Uzbekistan ranks 63rd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).