South Africa vs Sudan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita
South Africa
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
South Africa rank
89th
Sudan rank
86th
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Africa, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 89th and Sudan ranks 86th of 120 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita, South Africa or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita between South Africa and Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita?
- South Africa ranks 89th and Sudan ranks 86th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.