Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita
Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sudan rank
86th
Zimbabwe rank
89th
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 120 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Sudan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 kt per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita?
- Sudan ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.