Australia vs Congo: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Australia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
85th
Congo rank
84th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
00000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Australia ranks 85th and Congo ranks 84th of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Australia or Congo?
Congo, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Australia and Congo?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 85th and Congo ranks 84th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.