Central African Republic vs Zambia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
70th
Zambia rank
68th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Zambia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 70th and Zambia ranks 68th of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Zambia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Zambia rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 70th and Zambia ranks 68th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Zambia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/zambia/">Central African Republic vs Zambia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.