Costa Rica vs Suriname: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
48th
Suriname rank
47th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Suriname
0000196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 48th and Suriname ranks 47th of 120 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Suriname?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Suriname rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 48th and Suriname ranks 47th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Suriname: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/suriname/">Costa Rica vs Suriname: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.