Ecuador vs Malaysia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
27th
Malaysia rank
25th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 25th of 120 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Malaysia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 25th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.