Ecuador vs Rwanda: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
27th
Rwanda rank
28th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Rwanda
0000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 28th of 120 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Rwanda?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Rwanda?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 28th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Rwanda: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/rwanda/">Ecuador vs Rwanda: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.