Fiji vs Guatemala: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Fiji
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Fiji rank
54th
Guatemala rank
53rd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Fiji
  • Guatemala
0000196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 54th and Guatemala ranks 53rd of 120 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Fiji or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Fiji and Guatemala?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Guatemala rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Fiji ranks 54th and Guatemala ranks 53rd of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Guatemala: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/fiji/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/fiji/guatemala/">Fiji vs Guatemala: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.