Kenya vs Mauritania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Kenya
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
67th
Mauritania rank
65th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Mauritania
0000196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 67th and Mauritania ranks 65th of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kenya
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Kenya or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Kenya and Mauritania?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Mauritania rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 67th and Mauritania ranks 65th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Mauritania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/kenya/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/kenya/mauritania/">Kenya vs Mauritania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.