Malawi vs Uruguay: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Malawi
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
33rd
Uruguay rank
32nd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Uruguay
000000196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Malawi or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Malawi and Uruguay?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Uruguay rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 33rd and Uruguay ranks 32nd of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Uruguay: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uruguay/">Malawi vs Uruguay: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.