Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Puerto Rico
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
89th
Zimbabwe rank
89th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zimbabwe
000000196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
Puerto Rico, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Puerto Rico ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/">Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.