Solomon Islands vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Solomon Islands
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands rank
64th
Uzbekistan rank
61st

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Uzbekistan
00000196119922023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 64th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 120 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Solomon Islands or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Solomon Islands and Uzbekistan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Solomon Islands and Uzbekistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Solomon Islands ranks 64th and Uzbekistan ranks 61st of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/solomon-islands/uzbekistan/">Solomon Islands vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.