Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Sri Lanka
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka rank
4th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00000196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 25.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Sri Lanka ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 120 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Sri Lanka or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sri Lanka, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sri Lanka and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Sri Lanka ranks 4th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/sri-lanka/sub-saharan-africa/">Sri Lanka vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.