Australia vs Romania: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Australia
-26.04 % change on previous year
in 2023
Romania
-26.67 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia rank
117th
Romania rank
119th

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Australia
  • Romania
02004006008001.0k196219922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports -26.04 % change on previous year against -26.67 % change on previous year in Romania, a difference of 0.63 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 117th and Romania ranks 119th of 130 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Romania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 9.77 % change on previous year 19.27 % change on previous year 9.5 % change on previous year Romania
1970s 11.88 % change on previous year -1 % change on previous year 12.88 % change on previous year Australia
1980s 3.48 % change on previous year 7.56 % change on previous year 4.08 % change on previous year Romania
1990s 6.92 % change on previous year -21.12 % change on previous year 28.04 % change on previous year Australia
2000s 17.18 % change on previous year 110.67 % change on previous year 93.49 % change on previous year Romania
2010s 51.54 % change on previous year -5.55 % change on previous year 57.1 % change on previous year Australia
2020s 190.15 % change on previous year -24.87 % change on previous year 215.02 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Australia or Romania?
Australia, at -26.04 % change on previous year against -26.67 % change on previous year in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Australia and Romania?
0.63 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Romania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Australia and Romania rank globally for rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Australia ranks 117th and Romania ranks 119th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Romania: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/australia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/australia/romania/">Australia vs Romania: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,130 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.