Guatemala vs Northern America: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Guatemala
79.66 % change on previous year
in 2023
Northern America
35.31 % change on previous year
in 2023
Guatemala rank
3rd
Northern America rank
1st

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Guatemala
  • Northern America
-50-250255075196219922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 79.66 % change on previous year against 35.31 % change on previous year in Northern America, a difference of 44.35 % change on previous year.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 2.3 times Northern America's.

The two have swapped places 36 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 3rd and Northern America ranks 1st of 130 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Northern America in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Northern America Difference Ahead
1960s 5.64 % change on previous year 6.06 % change on previous year 0.4203 % change on previous year Northern America
1970s 8.39 % change on previous year 4.4 % change on previous year 3.99 % change on previous year Guatemala
1980s 5.23 % change on previous year 2.89 % change on previous year 2.34 % change on previous year Guatemala
1990s 1.78 % change on previous year 3.38 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year Northern America
2000s -3.59 % change on previous year 0.5336 % change on previous year 4.12 % change on previous year Northern America
2010s -2 % change on previous year -0.315 % change on previous year 1.68 % change on previous year Northern America
2020s 24.27 % change on previous year 6.51 % change on previous year 17.77 % change on previous year Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Guatemala or Northern America?
Guatemala, at 79.66 % change on previous year against 35.31 % change on previous year in Northern America as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Guatemala and Northern America?
44.35 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Northern America?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Northern America rank globally for rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Guatemala ranks 3rd and Northern America ranks 1st of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Northern America: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/guatemala/northern-america/">Guatemala vs Northern America: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,130 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.