Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Mauritania
15.25 % change on previous year
in 2023
Russian Federation
13.75 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritania rank
16th
Russian Federation rank
19th

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritania
  • Russian Federation
-50050100150200196219922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 15.25 % change on previous year against 13.75 % change on previous year in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.5 % change on previous year.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 130 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 10.2 % change on previous year -6.14 % change on previous year 16.34 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s -3.19 % change on previous year 5.43 % change on previous year 8.62 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s 22.75 % change on previous year 1.75 % change on previous year 21 % change on previous year Mauritania
2020s 13.77 % change on previous year -0.2466 % change on previous year 14.01 % change on previous year Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Mauritania or Russian Federation?
Mauritania, at 15.25 % change on previous year against 13.75 % change on previous year in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Mauritania and Russian Federation?
1.5 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Russian Federation?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Russian Federation rank globally for rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Mauritania ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/mauritania/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/mauritania/russian-federation-2/">Mauritania vs Russian Federation: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,130 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.