Sub-Saharan Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Sub-Saharan Africa
5.03 % change on previous year
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
20 % change on previous year
in 1991
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
11th
Yugoslav SFR rank
10th

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Yugoslav SFR
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 20 % change on previous year against 5.03 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 14.97 % change on previous year.

That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 4.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 11th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 10th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 2 and Yugoslav SFR in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 3.41 % change on previous year 5.07 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR
1970s 3.1 % change on previous year 2.99 % change on previous year 0.1112 % change on previous year Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 4.49 % change on previous year -1.54 % change on previous year 6.03 % change on previous year Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 0.1585 % change on previous year 17.69 % change on previous year 17.53 % change on previous year Yugoslav SFR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Sub-Saharan Africa or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 20 % change on previous year against 5.03 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 1991.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Sub-Saharan Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
14.97 % change on previous year, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 11th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 10th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sub-saharan-africa/yugoslav-sfr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sub-saharan-africa/yugoslav-sfr/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,130 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.