Kazakhstan vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
71st
Turkmenistan rank
70th

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Turkmenistan
0000199220072023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 71st and Turkmenistan ranks 70th of 102 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan rank globally for rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 71st and Turkmenistan ranks 70th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/turkmenistan/">Kazakhstan vs Turkmenistan: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.