Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Saudi Arabia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
98th
Zimbabwe rank
97th

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zimbabwe
00000196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.8 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Saudi Arabia ranks 98th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 102 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Saudi Arabia ranks 98th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/">Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.