Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Kazakhstan
12.94 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritania
15.22 % change on previous year
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
20th
Mauritania rank
17th

Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritania
-50050100150196219922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 15.22 % change on previous year against 12.94 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.28 % change on previous year.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mauritania ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 20th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 130 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -8.71 % change on previous year 10.26 % change on previous year 18.96 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s 4.04 % change on previous year -3.12 % change on previous year 7.16 % change on previous year Kazakhstan
2010s 4.74 % change on previous year 22.67 % change on previous year 17.93 % change on previous year Mauritania
2020s -2.11 % change on previous year 13.78 % change on previous year 15.88 % change on previous year Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 15.22 % change on previous year against 12.94 % change on previous year in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
2.28 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Kazakhstan ranks 20th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 130 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/kazakhstan/mauritania/">Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 9,158 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.