Cuba vs Tajikistan: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2023
Tajikistan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
56th
Tajikistan rank
58th
Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Tajikistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 56th and Tajikistan ranks 58th of 102 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita, Cuba or Tajikistan?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita between Cuba and Tajikistan?
- 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Tajikistan rank globally for rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 56th and Tajikistan ranks 58th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.