Peru vs Uganda: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Peru
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru rank
41st
Uganda rank
38th

Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Peru
  • Uganda
0000196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 41st and Uganda ranks 38th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Peru
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Peru
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Peru
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Peru
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Peru
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Peru or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Peru and Uganda?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for rice — crop residues (emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Peru ranks 41st and Uganda ranks 38th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Uganda: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/peru/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/peru/uganda/">Peru vs Uganda: Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.