China, Hong Kong SAR vs Fiji: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 1978
Fiji
-50 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
118th
Fiji rank
117th

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Fiji
-100-50050196219922023

How they compare

Fiji currently reports -50 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 50 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Fiji ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 118th and Fiji ranks 117th of 127 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Fiji Difference Ahead
1960s -2.74 % change on previous year -3.11 % change on previous year 0.3638 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s -32.02 % change on previous year -0.3587 % change on previous year 31.66 % change on previous year Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Fiji?
Fiji, at -50 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Fiji?
50 % change on previous year, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Fiji?
17 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1978.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Fiji rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 118th and Fiji ranks 117th of 127 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Fiji: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/fiji/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Fiji: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,906 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.