Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 1993
Trinidad and Tobago
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Eswatini rank
118th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
118th

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-100-50050100196219912021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 118th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 127 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 10.42 % change on previous year -2.08 % change on previous year 12.5 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s -0.8333 % change on previous year 7.01 % change on previous year 7.85 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1980s -8.33 % change on previous year 14.08 % change on previous year 22.42 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago
1990s -25 % change on previous year 4.82 % change on previous year 29.82 % change on previous year Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Eswatini or Trinidad and Tobago?
Eswatini, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Trinidad and Tobago as of 1993.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1993.
How do Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 118th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 118th of 127 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/trinidad-and-tobago/">Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,906 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.