Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate

Saudi Arabia
-100 % change on previous year
in 1972
Zimbabwe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
118th

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zimbabwe
-100-50050100196219922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 127 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6.25 % change on previous year 18.75 % change on previous year 12.5 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1970s -33.33 % change on previous year -11.11 % change on previous year 22.22 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate, Saudi Arabia or Zimbabwe?
Saudi Arabia, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 1972.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate between Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
0 % change on previous year, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe?
11 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1972.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Saudi Arabia ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 127 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/saudi-arabia/zimbabwe/">Saudi Arabia vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
160 places, 8,906 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.