Mauritius vs Saudi Arabia: Rice — Crop residues
Rice — Crop residues over time
- Mauritius
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 109th and Saudi Arabia ranks 109th of 115 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues, Mauritius or Saudi Arabia?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Mauritius and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saudi Arabia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Saudi Arabia rank globally for rice — crop residues?
- Mauritius ranks 109th and Saudi Arabia ranks 109th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).