Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues

Papua New Guinea
0.0001 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.0001 kt
in 2050
Papua New Guinea rank
104th
Zimbabwe rank
104th

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
00000196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 0 kt 0 kt 0 kt
2000s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0001 kt 0.0003 kt 0.0002 kt Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt Papua New Guinea
2030s 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt
2050s 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt 0 kt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0 kt, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — crop residues?
Papua New Guinea ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).