Ecuador vs Mauritania: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita

Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2023
Mauritania
0 kt per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
26th
Mauritania rank
23rd

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
0000196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per person.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 26th and Mauritania ranks 23rd of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per person 0 kt per person 0 kt per person Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per capita, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per capita between Ecuador and Mauritania?
0 kt per person, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 26th and Mauritania ranks 23rd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-capita/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-capita/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.