Argentina vs El Salvador: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Argentina
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
64th
El Salvador rank
61st

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • El Salvador
00000196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 61st of 102 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Argentina or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Argentina and El Salvador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and El Salvador rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 64th and El Salvador ranks 61st of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs El Salvador: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/argentina/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/argentina/el-salvador/">Argentina vs El Salvador: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.