Ecuador vs Liberia: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
29th
Liberia rank
27th

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Liberia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 29th and Liberia ranks 27th of 102 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Liberia?
Liberia, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Liberia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Liberia rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 29th and Liberia ranks 27th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Liberia: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/liberia/">Ecuador vs Liberia: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.