Ecuador vs Rwanda: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
29th
Rwanda rank
28th
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 28th of 102 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
- Ecuador ranks 29th and Rwanda ranks 28th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.