Eswatini vs Mauritius: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Eswatini
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2019
Eswatini rank
94th
Mauritius rank
94th

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mauritius
0000196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 94th and Mauritius ranks 94th of 102 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Mauritius?
Eswatini, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Mauritius?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
34 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 94th and Mauritius ranks 94th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mauritius: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mauritius/">Eswatini vs Mauritius: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.