Guatemala vs Puerto Rico: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Guatemala
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
60th
Puerto Rico rank
59th

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Puerto Rico
0000196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Guatemala ranks 60th and Puerto Rico ranks 59th of 102 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Puerto Rico?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Puerto Rico?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Puerto Rico rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 60th and Puerto Rico ranks 59th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Puerto Rico: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/puerto-rico-us/">Guatemala vs Puerto Rico: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.