Mauritius vs South Africa: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre

Mauritius
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2019
South Africa
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
94th
South Africa rank
92nd

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • South Africa
0000196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1968 it was South Africa ahead.

Mauritius ranks 94th and South Africa ranks 92nd of 102 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre, Mauritius or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre between Mauritius and South Africa?
0 kt per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and South Africa?
34 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2019.
How do Mauritius and South Africa rank globally for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 94th and South Africa ranks 92nd of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs South Africa: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/south-africa/">Mauritius vs South Africa: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
104 places, 6,018 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.