Australia and New Zealand vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate
Australia and New Zealand
-26.06 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
-18.29 % change on previous year
in 1990
Australia and New Zealand rank
120th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
117th
Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -18.29 % change on previous year against -26.06 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 7.77 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th of 131 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.8 % change on previous year | -2.98 % change on previous year | 12.78 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 11.88 % change on previous year | -33.13 % change on previous year | 45.01 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | 3.48 % change on previous year | -27.21 % change on previous year | 30.69 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 13.29 % change on previous year | -18.29 % change on previous year | 31.58 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -18.29 % change on previous year against -26.06 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 1990.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 7.77 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1990.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 120th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.