Australia vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate
Australia
-26.06 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
-18.29 % change on previous year
in 1990
Australia rank
120th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
117th
Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate over time
- Australia
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -18.29 % change on previous year against -26.06 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 7.77 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 120th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th of 131 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.8 % change on previous year | -2.98 % change on previous year | 12.78 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1970s | 11.88 % change on previous year | -33.13 % change on previous year | 45.01 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1980s | 3.48 % change on previous year | -27.21 % change on previous year | 30.69 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1990s | 13.29 % change on previous year | -18.29 % change on previous year | 31.58 % change on previous year | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate, Australia or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -18.29 % change on previous year against -26.06 % change on previous year in Australia as of 1990.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate between Australia and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 7.77 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1990.
- How do Australia and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate?
- Australia ranks 120th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.