Central African Republic vs Ecuador: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate

Central African Republic
3 % change on previous year
in 2023
Ecuador
3.51 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
46th
Ecuador rank
45th

Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Ecuador
-1000100200300400196219922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.51 % change on previous year against 3 % change on previous year in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.51 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 46th and Ecuador ranks 45th of 131 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 20.77 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year 18.49 % change on previous year Central African Republic
1970s 3.96 % change on previous year 4.03 % change on previous year 0.0627 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s -0.3768 % change on previous year 12.75 % change on previous year 13.13 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 7.38 % change on previous year 6.39 % change on previous year 0.9929 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2000s 7.21 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year 4.98 % change on previous year Central African Republic
2010s -6.36 % change on previous year -4.52 % change on previous year 1.83 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s 101.64 % change on previous year 9.49 % change on previous year 92.15 % change on previous year Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate, Central African Republic or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 3.51 % change on previous year against 3 % change on previous year in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate between Central African Republic and Ecuador?
0.51 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Ecuador?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Ecuador rank globally for rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate?
Central African Republic ranks 46th and Ecuador ranks 45th of 131 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Ecuador: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-n-content-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-n-content-annual-growth-rate/central-african-republic/ecuador/">Central African Republic vs Ecuador: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,296 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.