China, Hong Kong SAR vs El Salvador: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-18.29 % change on previous year
in 1990
El Salvador
-24.24 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
117th
El Salvador rank
119th

Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • El Salvador
-50050196219922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -18.29 % change on previous year against -24.24 % change on previous year in El Salvador, a difference of 5.95 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1962 it was El Salvador ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and El Salvador ranks 119th of 131 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s -2.98 % change on previous year 13.72 % change on previous year 16.7 % change on previous year El Salvador
1970s -33.13 % change on previous year 8.24 % change on previous year 41.37 % change on previous year El Salvador
1980s -27.21 % change on previous year 3.12 % change on previous year 30.33 % change on previous year El Salvador
1990s -18.29 % change on previous year -5.03 % change on previous year 13.26 % change on previous year El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or El Salvador?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -18.29 % change on previous year against -24.24 % change on previous year in El Salvador as of 1990.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and El Salvador?
5.95 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and El Salvador?
29 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1990.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and El Salvador rank globally for rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and El Salvador ranks 119th of 131 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs El Salvador: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/el-salvador/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs El Salvador: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,296 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.