China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Republic of Tanzania: Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate
China, Hong Kong SAR
-18.29 % change on previous year
in 1990
United Republic of Tanzania
-14.27 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
117th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
115th
Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports -14.27 % change on previous year against -18.29 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 4.02 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1962 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 115th of 131 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -2.98 % change on previous year | 13.54 % change on previous year | 16.52 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1970s | -33.13 % change on previous year | 8.08 % change on previous year | 41.21 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1980s | -27.21 % change on previous year | 7.03 % change on previous year | 34.24 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1990s | -18.29 % change on previous year | 1.17 % change on previous year | 19.47 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at -14.27 % change on previous year against -18.29 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 4.02 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1990.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for rice — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 117th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 115th of 131 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Rice — Crop residues (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.