Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Rice — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
9.29 million kg
in 2050
Cuba
9.65 million kg
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
43rd
Cuba rank
42nd

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Cuba
05.0M10.0M15.0M196120052050

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 9.65 million kg against 9.29 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 360,820 kg.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Cuba ranks 42nd of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 1.87 million kg 2.92 million kg 1.05 million kg Cuba
1970s 4.42 million kg 6.49 million kg 2.07 million kg Cuba
1980s 7.51 million kg 6.93 million kg 575,327 kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 11.09 million kg 6.70 million kg 4.39 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 6.47 million kg 7.39 million kg 914,044 kg Cuba
2010s 6.09 million kg 6.96 million kg 872,444 kg Cuba
2020s 4.00 million kg 2.62 million kg 1.38 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2030s 7.59 million kg 7.62 million kg 32,130 kg Cuba
2050s 9.29 million kg 9.65 million kg 360,820 kg Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Cuba?
Cuba, at 9.65 million kg against 9.29 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
360,820 kg, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Cuba rank globally for rice — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Cuba ranks 42nd of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-n-content-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-n-content-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/cuba/">Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).