Australia and New Zealand vs China, Taiwan Province of: Rice Cultivation — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
36 kt
in 2050
China, Taiwan Province of
45.92 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
53rd
China, Taiwan Province of rank
50th

Rice Cultivation — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • China, Taiwan Province of
050100150196120052050

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 45.92 kt against 36 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 9.92 kt.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 53rd and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 50th of 141 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand China, Taiwan Province of Difference Ahead
1960s 8.11 kt 142.47 kt 134.35 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 21.36 kt 138.19 kt 116.83 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 33.76 kt 104.46 kt 70.7 kt China, Taiwan Province of
1990s 41.49 kt 69.58 kt 28.09 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 23.59 kt 50.71 kt 27.12 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 20.02 kt 48.09 kt 28.07 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 12.98 kt 43.08 kt 30.1 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2030s 29.57 kt 51.69 kt 22.11 kt China, Taiwan Province of
2050s 36 kt 45.92 kt 9.92 kt China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice cultivation — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or China, Taiwan Province of?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 45.92 kt against 36 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice cultivation — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and China, Taiwan Province of?
9.92 kt, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and China, Taiwan Province of?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and China, Taiwan Province of rank globally for rice cultivation — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 53rd and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 50th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs China, Taiwan Province of: Rice Cultivation — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-cultivation-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/china-taiwan-province-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-cultivation-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/china-taiwan-province-of/">Australia and New Zealand vs China, Taiwan Province of: Rice Cultivation — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice Cultivation — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 10,472 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf